Since at least 1958 the military has engaged in spraying particles into the air presumably to study weather modification. These activities were sporadic in time and location. But about 2010, during the Obama Administration, the aerial spraying of particulates became a near-daily activity across North America, the European Union, the British Commonwealth, and other countries including China, Egypt, India, Russia and perhaps others. This was a covert activity with denial and disinformation seemingly coordinated at all levels of government. No information was made available on the particle compositions sprayed into the air we all breathe, and no information on potentially adverse health risks. Following are statements/questions with links to answers:

J. Marvin Herndon, PhD and Mark Whiteside, MD, MPH and a few colleagues to date are the only scientists to publish in the peer-reviewed scientific literature on the compositions, human and eenvironmental health risks of the aerial spraying and their psuedo-legal basis:

 ●Global Environmental Warfare Publications (click here)

 ●Scientific and Medical Humanitarian Publications (click here)

● Evidence of Undisclosed Global Geoengineering (click here)

Concerted efforts to deceive the medical community and citizens of the public health risks of the aerial spraying by lying, coercing, and pressuring editors and journal personnel to retract peer-reviewed and published public health scientific articles (click here).

How can a non-scientist understand the aerial spraying and its consequences, particularly on health? One way is to listen to and view the scientifically-correct music videos whose lyrics were written by J. Marvin Herndon. (click here)

What are they spraying into the air we breathe? Forensic scientific investigations are consistent with coal fly ash the toxic waste product of buring coal being the main substance sprayed into the air we breathe (click here).

How do particles sprayed into the air affect the weather? Persistent aerial spraying of particulate matter into the regions where clouds form (1) inhibits rainfall to the point of massive downpours, the so-called "drought or deluge" effect, (2) heats the atmosphere, (3) retards heat loss from the Earth, and (4) upon falling to earth, absorbs sunlight. In short, the aerial spraying destroys the natural weather cycle, contaminates Earth’s biosphere, and causes global warming — consequences falsely blamed on fossil fuel burning.

California Desiccation: Setting the Stage for California Fires (click here).

How does the aerial spraying endanger human health? The adverse public health effects of aerosolized particulate matter can be inferred from pollution studies of particulates 2.5 mm and smaller. Exposure to such particles has been shown to be associated with increased hospital admissions, morbidity and premature mortality, risk for cardiovascular disease and lung cancer, other lung diseases including asthma, diabetes, risk for stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, reduced renal function in older men, low birth weight, reduced male fertility and decreased cognitive ability in older women. Adverse health effects of aerosolized coal fly ash (CFA) include (1) neurological disorders, such as Autism Spectrum Disorder, Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease, (2) lung cancer and respiratory disorders, and (3) numerous other disorders resulting from the plethora of toxic elements in this material, including arsenic, mercury, and radioactive elements. The most at risk are the young, the old, and those with compromised respiratory and immune systems.

An Open Letter to Members of AGU, EGU, and IPCC Alleging Promotion of Fake Science at the Expense of Human and Environmental Health (click here).

Earth scientists, even those who study the atmosphere, are silent about the near-daily aerial particulate spraying as if it does not exist. Why would they not tell the truth when science is all about telling the truth, the full truth? What corrupted Earth scientists? (click here)

Explanations of three attempts (two successful) by a disinformation team to cause retractions of peer-reviewed and published public health scientific papers that provide evidence of slow and insidious aerosol poisoning of millions of people. No one has the right to poison people and no one has the right to hide public health risks from the public. Their actions prove that those ordering the aerosol spraying know well the health risks and want to hide that knowledge from the public. (click here for pdf)

WebPage: Public Deception by Scientists in Environmental Research Letters (click here)

WebPage: Science Magazine Geoengineering Non-Debate: Ignorance is not an Option, but Neither is Deceit (click here)
WebPage: Communications with San Diego Officials (click here)
PDF: Partial list of websites reporting toxic spraying (click here)

Thousands of Photos Showing Aerial Particulate Spraying (click here)

For more than six decades, scientists have thought that the Earth's magnetic field is generated by convection-driven dynamo-action in the Earth's fluid core. Then, J. Marvin Herndon demonstrated that sustained convection, and hence dynamo-action, in the Earth's fluid core is physically impossible, but not physically impossible in the georeactor. The georeactor is thus the energy source and the place of dynamo production of the geomagnetic field. Significantly, the georeactor is only one ten-millionth as massive as the Earth's core, meaning that changes in the geomagnetic field, such as reversals, can take place much more rapidly than previously thought.

New Review Article: Terracentric Nuclear Fission Georeactor (click here for pdf) Current Science, 2014, 106(4), 528-541.
WebPages:
Physical Impossibility of Earth-core Convection (click here)
Convection-driven Dynamo-action in the Georeactor as the Origin of the Geomagnetic Field (click here)
Important Paper: J. Marvin Herndon, Nuclear georeactor generation of the Earth's geomagnetic field. (click here for pdf), Current Science, 2007, 93,1485-1487.
For Teachers: Teaching Students to Question Earth-Core Convection (click here)
YouTube Video: Origin of Earth's Magnetic Field (click here) Download .mp4 video file (click here) 

Fjords occur in different parts of the world suggesting a common origin. Although being the subject of debate for more than a century, a common origin has not yet been disclosed; the relative importance of glaciation is still controversial. Here J. Marvin Herndon proposes that the primary origin of fjords, like submarine canyons, occurs as a consequence of decompression-driven Earth surface curvature changes, and suggests that glaciation, rather than being the primary agent of fjord formation, as widely assumed, instead is the principal agent of fjord preservation. J. Marvin Herndon, Origin of Fjords... (click here)

Descriptions of phenomena, events, or processes made on the basis of problematic paradigms can be unreasonably complex (e.g. epicycles) or simply wrong (e.g. ultraviolet catastrophe). Supercontinent cycles, also called Wilson cycles, are, J. Marvin Herndon submits, artificial constructs, like epicycles. Herndon provides the basis for that assertion and describes published considerations from a fundamentally different, new, indivisible geoscience paradigm which obviate the necessity for assuming supercontinent cycles.

WebPage: Fictitious Supercontinent Cycles (click here)

Important Paper: J. Marvin Herndon, Fictitious Supercontinent Cycles (click here for pdf)

The visionary evolutionist, Lynn Margulis, taught the importance of envisioning the Earth as a whole, rather than as unrelated segments spread among various scientific specialties. In that spirit, and in the broader framework of the Solar System, J. Marvin Herndon presents a new, indivisible planetary science paradigm, a wholly self-consistent vision of the nature of matter in the Solar System, and dynamics and energy sources of planets which differs profoundly from the half-century old, popular, but problematic paradigm. This is a new foundation from which much development is possible.

Important Paper: J. Marvin Herndon, New Indivisible Planetary Science Paradigm (click here for pdf) Current Science, 2013, 105(4), 450-460.

WebPage: New Indivisible Planetary Science Paradigm Summary (click here)

Abstract: I present here a new, indivisible planetary science paradigm, a wholly self-consistent vision of the nature of matter in the Solar System, and dynamics and energy sources of planets. Massive-core planets formed by condensing and raining-out from within giant gaseous protoplanets at high pressures and high temperatures. Earth’s complete condensation included a ~300 Earth-mass gigantic gas/ice shell that compressed the rocky kernel to about 66% of Earth’s present diameter. T-Tauri eruptions stripped the gases away from the inner planets and stripped a portion of Mercury’s incompletely condensed protoplanet, and transported it to the region between Mars and Jupiter where it fused with in-falling oxidized condensate from the outer regions of the Solar System and formed the parent matter of ordinary chondrite meteorites, the main-Belt asteroids, and veneer for the inner planets, especially Mars. In response to decompression-driven planetary volume increases, cracks form to increase surface area and mountain ranges characterized by folding form to accommodate changes in curvature. The differences between the inner planets are primarily the consequence of different degrees of protoplanetary compression. The internal composition of Mercury is calculated by analogy with Earth. The rationale is provided for Mars potentially having a greater subsurface water reservoir capacity than before realized.

For twenty years, NASA-funded scientists were unable to explain in a logical, causally related way why Jupiter, Saturn, and Neptune radiate about twice as much energy as they receive from the Sun. Then, J. Marvin Herndon published the concept of planetocentric nuclear fission reactors as the cause.WebPage: Feasibility of Nuclear Reactors in the Giant Outer Planets (click here)

Herndon followed by demonstrating the feasibility and providing evidence for a natural nuclear fission reactor, the georeactor, at the center of Earth as the energy source and production mechanism for the geomagnetic field:

WebPage: Convection-driven Dynamo-action in the Georeactor as the Origin of the Geomagnetic Field (click here)

Natural nuclear fission reactors may provide reasonable explanations for other "NASA mysteries" including: (1) Our Moon having a soft or molten core; (2) Tiny planet Mercury having a magnetic field; (3) Mars displaying evidence of an ancient magnetic field; (4) Our Moon displaying evidence of an ancient magnetic field; (5) Jupiter’s moon Ganymede having an internally generated magnetic field; (6) Jupiter's moon Io being extremely volcanic; (7) Saturn’s moon Enceladus showing evidence of internal heating; and, (8) Evidence of internal heat generation in Pluto’s moon Charon:

WebPage: Nature of Planetary Matter (click here)

Important Paper: Herndon, J. M., Nature of planetary matter and magnetic field generation in the Solar System. (click here for pdf) Current Science, 2009, 96, 1033-1039.

J. Marvin Herndon discovered a fundamental relationship using published whole-rock chondrite molar Mg/Fe and Si/Fe ratios. This relationship admits the possibility that ordinary chondrite meteorites are derived from two components: one is a relatively undifferentiated, primitive component, oxidized like the CI or C1 carbonaceous chondrites; the other is a somewhat differentiated, planetary component, with oxidation state like the highly reduced enstatite chondrites. Such a picture would seem to explain for the ordinary chondrites, their major element compositions, their intermediate states of oxidation, and their ubiquitous deficiencies of refractory siderophile elements. J. Marvin Herndon suggested that the planetary component of ordinary chondrite formation consists of planet Mercury’s missing complement of elements.

WebPage: Origin of Ordinary Chondrite Meteorites (click here)

Important Paper: Herndon, J. M., Discovery of fundamental mass ratio relationships of whole-rock chondritic major elements: Implications on ordinary chondrite formation and on planet Mercury's composition. (Click here for pdf) Current Science, 2007, 93, 394-399.

The MESSENGER spacecraft currently orbiting Mercury sent back images of recent volatile-related activity on Mercury's surface characterized by pits associated with highly reflective surface material that puzzled NASA scientists. In a recent scientific communication, J. Marvin Herndon proposed an explanation. If Mercury's core material condensed from primordial matter at pressures of one atmosphere or more, iron would condense as a liquid capable of dissolving copious amounts of hydrogen. Later, as Mercury's core solidified, the hydrogen would be released and would escape at the surface, producing hydrogen geysers, forming the observed pits, and reducing iron sulfide to metal, thus accounting for the associated highly reflective material.

WebPage: Mercury Hollows Explained by Hydrogen Geysers (click here)

Important Paper: Herndon, J. M., Hydrogen geysers: explanation for observed evidence of geologically recent volatile-related activity on Mercury's surface. (click here for pdf) Current Science, 2012, 103, 361-362.

More than seven decades ago, scientists thought they had solved the problem of how thermonuclear reactions in stars ignite automatically during formation. Later, although there were indications of serious problems, no one except J. Marvin Herndon, thought to ask "What's wrong with this picture?" and to re-think the problem. The result was realizing that thermonuclear reactions in stars, as in hydrogen bombs, are ignited by nuclear fission. Without fissionable elements to spark ignition, the stars remain dark.

WebPage: Thermonuclear Ignition of Stars and the Nature of Dark Matter (click here)

Important Paper: Herndon, J. M., Planetary and protostellar nuclear fission: Implications for planetary change, stellar ignition and dark matter. (click here for pdf) Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1994, A455, 453-461.

YouTube Video: Lighting the Stars (click here) Download .wmv video file (click here)

Before Herndon, the characteristic features of galaxies were inexplicable, because astrophysics had been built upon a flawed foundation for more than seven decades, i.e., the belief that stars automatically ignite upon formation. Now, Herndon points the way toward understanding for the first time galactic luminous star distributions, which are a prominent, common feature of galaxies, making the galaxies appear as they do.

WebPage: J. Marvin Herndon's Structure of Galaxies (click here)

YouTube Video: The Origin of Galaxies (click here) Download .wmv video file (click here)

Important Paper: Herndon, J. M., New concept for internal heat production in hot Jupiter exo-planets, thermonuclear ignition of dark galaxies, and the basis for galactic luminous star distributions. (click here for pdf) Current Science, 2009, 96, 1453-1456.

YouTube Video: Origin of Earth's Magnetic Field (click here) This video is best "watched in high quality" as it contains an experimental demonstration of why long-term convection, and hence dynamo-action, in the fluid core is impossible. Download .mp4 video file (click here).

YouTube Video: Lighting the Stars (click here) The nature of star ignition has been misunderstood since a mistake was made in the 1930s and subsequently built upon J. Marvin Herndon reveals the mistake and describes the rationale for his correcting it. (click here for notes and references)  Download .wmv video file (click here).

YouTube Video: The Origin of Galaxies (click here) Observations arranged into a logical order reveal causal relationships leading to a new fundamental understanding of the origin of galaxies. Download .wmv video file (click here).

YouTube Video: No Mantle Convection!!! (click here) Plate tectonics theory is incomplete, providing no energy source for geodynamics and depends critically on the assumption of mantle convection. This video shows the reason that mantle convection is physically impossible. Download .wmv video file (click here).

YouTube Video: 21st Century Earth Dynamics Part 1 (click here) and 21st Century Earth Dynamics Part 2 (click here) This is a two-part video about a complete, new geodynamic theory, recently published in the scientific literature, called Whole-Earth Decompression Dynamics, that unifies and supersedes plate tectonics and Earth expansion theories. Download .wmv video file Part 1 (click here). Download .wmv video file Part 2 (click here).

YouTube Video: Put Teachers on Top (click here) Download .wmv video file (click here).

+ Richard D. Oldham's Discovery of the Earth's Core (click here)

+ Inge Lehmann's Discovery of the Earth's Inner Core (click here)

+ Otto Hahn and Fritz Strassmann's Discovery of Nuclear Fission and Consequences (click here)

+ Paul K. Kuroda's Feasibility of Natural Nuclear Reactors in Uranium Mines (click here)

+ French Discovery of Fossil Natural Reactors at Oklo, Republic of Gabon (click here)

The scientific foundations described on this website have been published in the following, premiere scientific journals: Naturwissenschaften, Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, Current Science, and Earth, Moon, and Planets. When an important new contradiction to prevailing ideas arises in the realm of ethical science, the new concept should be discussed and debated, subjected, if possible, to experimental and/or theoretical verification, refuted if wrong, or otherwise acknowledged. Scientists throughout the world are invited to ascribe to that standard. Secure in the belief that science and truth should go hand in hand with the freedom to learn about and to understand the world in which we live, this web site is dedicated to the dissemination of information to all people: to scientists and, especially, to interested persons everywhere.